QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml to memes • 4 months agoDeterminism Wimagemessage-square122 fedilinkarrow-up1100cross-posted to: memes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmygrad.ml
arrow-up1100imageDeterminism WQueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml to memes • 4 months agomessage-square122 Commentsfedilinkcross-posted to: memes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmygrad.ml
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]hexbear4·4 months ago Your position from the first comment is free will and determinism both exist. Are you sure about that? link
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlhexagonhexbear1·edit-24 months ago Dialectical materialism holds that both are at work but that material conditions are dominant. Am I supposed to take "both" to not include "free will?" linkfedilink
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]hexbear4·4 months agoYou're supposed to review your claim to see whether it's accurate. link
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlhexagonhexbear1·4 months agoWhat claim do you want me to review? linkfedilink
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlhexagonhexbear1·edit-24 months agoI stand behind my impression that “both” was intended to mean that diamat is ultimately compatiblist. A claim I disagree with, as I am not a compatiblist, yet I see no conflict between that and my dialectical materialist outlook. linkfedilink
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]hexbear3·4 months agoDo you really not know what I'm challenging you on? link
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlhexagonhexbear1·4 months agoThe question is not yet settled by simply debunking religious dogma? linkfedilink
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlhexagonhexbear1·4 months agoThis conversation has gone all over the place, I don't know what point you were originally trying to make. linkfedilink
Are you sure about that?
Am I supposed to take "both" to not include "free will?"
You're supposed to review your claim to see whether it's accurate.
What claim do you want me to review?
The one I quoted
I stand behind my impression that “both” was intended to mean that diamat is ultimately compatiblist. A claim I disagree with, as I am not a compatiblist, yet I see no conflict between that and my dialectical materialist outlook.
Do you really not know what I'm challenging you on?
The question is not yet settled by simply debunking religious dogma?
I guess that's a yes lol
This conversation has gone all over the place, I don't know what point you were originally trying to make.