The takeaway from this story is a condemnation of US higher education tbh. Exquisitely gifted 13 year old graduates from college with a major in physics & a minor in math — wants to apply for PhD programs but his parents can’t afford it https://abc11.com/elliott-tanner-college-graduate-university-of-minnesota-physics-major/11788944/
I mean, I mostly thought school was boring as shit, but I think the vast majority of kids feel that way. It wouldn't have occurred to me to blame my parents for school being boring any more than it would have occurred to the average kid to resent or blame their parents for school being boring. I think pretty much every kid ever has gone "ugh, why do I have to spend 13-22 years doing this shit for 6-8 hours a day???"
The education system could and should absolutely be improved in many ways, but I don't think the answer, even in the short term, is to have kids spend less time in the only real communal environment they'll get for their entire lives.
I'll also say that, like most people, I remember a small fraction of what I learned in school. Getting to certain content sooner or getting through content faster wouldn't change the fact that by 25, I had a general base of knowledge, a lot of practice "learning how to learn", and specialized knowledge in my field. As a kid, I didn't really conceptualize forgetting things, since I basically never forgot anything. I knew it would happen. And I worried about it even. But I couldn't really understand what it would be like to have my brain prune unused/underused neural pathways. But it's important because it contributes to the conclusion that more doesn't necessarily equal better.
So, as I'm thinking through this, I could maybe see an argument for accelerating people with truly eidetic memories, because getting through more content will actually result in them knowing more, but that's a very special and rare case. Plus, people with eidetic memories are that much better at independent learning, and also far more likely to need additional social and emotional support that would come from not skipping ahead.
deleted by creator
I mean, I mostly thought school was boring as shit, but I think the vast majority of kids feel that way. It wouldn't have occurred to me to blame my parents for school being boring any more than it would have occurred to the average kid to resent or blame their parents for school being boring. I think pretty much every kid ever has gone "ugh, why do I have to spend 13-22 years doing this shit for 6-8 hours a day???"
The education system could and should absolutely be improved in many ways, but I don't think the answer, even in the short term, is to have kids spend less time in the only real communal environment they'll get for their entire lives.
I'll also say that, like most people, I remember a small fraction of what I learned in school. Getting to certain content sooner or getting through content faster wouldn't change the fact that by 25, I had a general base of knowledge, a lot of practice "learning how to learn", and specialized knowledge in my field. As a kid, I didn't really conceptualize forgetting things, since I basically never forgot anything. I knew it would happen. And I worried about it even. But I couldn't really understand what it would be like to have my brain prune unused/underused neural pathways. But it's important because it contributes to the conclusion that more doesn't necessarily equal better.
So, as I'm thinking through this, I could maybe see an argument for accelerating people with truly eidetic memories, because getting through more content will actually result in them knowing more, but that's a very special and rare case. Plus, people with eidetic memories are that much better at independent learning, and also far more likely to need additional social and emotional support that would come from not skipping ahead.