:desolate:

  • Nagarjuna [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yo, this is homophobic, but let's not overlook the fact that they named it "monkey pox" and are claiming it's from Africa. This is literally the homophobic/racist aids playbook all over again.

    • DinkyBingus [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      It's been well documented from the 1950s. It was first identified in monkeys in Central and West Africa, where the disease is endemic.

    • Dangitbobby [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is a textbook case of psychological projection. The mind has an unacceptable thought, which it must accuse The Other of having in order to relieve damaging cognitive dissonance.

      They didn't name it monkey pox because it's from Africa. They didn't name it monkey pox recently. It was named monkey pox because it is a disease of monkeys and it is a pox.

      • AcidSmiley [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        It was named monkey pox because it is a disease of monkeys

        it is mostly a rodent disease, monkeys were just the first host the virus was detected in

      • Nagarjuna [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        This is literally a parallel to AIDS though, it was portrayed as emerging from Africa and associated with "bush meat." The article also talks about monkey pox being endemic in Africa. It is the same rhetoric and it's going to get exaggerated from here on out.

        • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          except it's not nearly as fatal as AIDS and even if it was there were numerous social factors that caused AIDS to spread through the gay community in the way it did that just aren't as in effect now as they were in the 80s.

          • Nagarjuna [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            I'm not talking about the physical properties of the disease, I'm talking about how the mass media is constructing it.