Nakoichi [they/them]M to chapotraphouse • 9 months agoNot content to colonize one indigenous people, Zionists now tossing around colonizing already colonized Wyoming.imagemessage-square50 fedilinkarrow-up1106file-text
arrow-up1106imageNot content to colonize one indigenous people, Zionists now tossing around colonizing already colonized Wyoming.Nakoichi [they/them]M to chapotraphouse • 9 months agomessage-square50 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]hexbear63·9 months agoWe've had first settler-colonial ethnostate, but what about second settler-colonial ethnostate? link
minus-squarezifnab25 [he/him, any]hexbear31·9 months agoBetween the Dutch, the English, the French, the Spanish, and the dreaded scourge of we're on our fourth or fifth settler state, easy. link
minus-squarejohnmccainstumor [none/use name]hexbear24·edit-29 months agoNew York City? How would you like a settler colonialist state in your settler colonialist state? link
We've had first settler-colonial ethnostate, but what about second settler-colonial ethnostate?
Between the Dutch, the English, the French, the Spanish, and the dreaded scourge of
we're on our fourth or fifth settler state, easy.
Elevensies, you say?
New York City?
How would you like a settler colonialist state in your settler colonialist state?
Settler-colonial state squared.
Yo dawg...