I've never seen a coherent description of why it's wrong aside from a thinly veiled "my tribal flag says I disagree."
It come across like saying Newton's work was debunked because it doesn't describe some quantum obscurity despite it obviously still being useful and correct.
Or it's like saying Newton's work is debunked because the earth is flat. I can't tell you if the competing theories are actually better, but I don't think they're proven.
Or that mushrooms are debunked because it's low in iron.
There's a lot that's interesting to read, but you'll probably only see people cheering their team's chants in that thread.
I've never seen a coherent description of why it's wrong aside from a thinly veiled "my tribal flag says I disagree."
It come across like saying Newton's work was debunked because it doesn't describe some quantum obscurity despite it obviously still being useful and correct.
Or it's like saying Newton's work is debunked because the earth is flat. I can't tell you if the competing theories are actually better, but I don't think they're proven.
Or that mushrooms are debunked because it's low in iron.
There's a lot that's interesting to read, but you'll probably only see people cheering their team's chants in that thread.