The case is an unusual one for the court. Instead of looking at a rule that has already been established, this one will set a precedent for future actions, specifically those tied to the EPA’s authority to regulate power plant emissions. Should the court rule against the EPA, that could hamper the Biden administration’s plans to combat climate change, as regulating authority could shift to Congress.
It seems that from reading this thread, this article doesn’t quite grasp the potential ramifications of this case, which are that it could end the ability of Congress to delegate to federal agencies to implement policy.
:biden-troll: States rights, Mack
Any country invading the US in the future to stop its emissions is 100% justified and any radlib who opposes it as "reverse-imperialism" or something ought to be shot.
Anyone who invades the US basically has the same right to be there as the current invader-occupiers of the US.
deleted by creator
This is what the radlibs are going to say.
Nukes exist, no country is ever invading the states
They're going to start considering it when the US starts fracking the entire country and Canada, it's lapdog, starts processing and burning the tarsands which would be an additional global 0.4C just by itself.
Presumably China et al know where the nukes are? Maybe insert tactical teams to deactivate them all at the same time, idk?
IDK, what if we lose the infrastructure to launch them?