What are your thoughts on the article?
Excerpt from the first few paragraphs of the article (the rest is inside):
In 2019, I stood outside a for-profit child migrant jail in the city of Homestead, Florida. I was watching then-presidential hopeful Sen. Kamala Harris speak out against the facility, initially opened under the Obama administration and reopened under former President Donald Trump. “It’s a human rights abuse being committed by the United States government,” Harris said at the time, flanked by fellow Democratic candidates Julian Castro, Pete Buttigieg and Kirsten Gillibrand.
The parade of candidates making the obligatory campaign stop at this immigrant jail that caused so much outrage across the country included every Democratic presidential candidate competing in the 2020 cycle, excluding Joe Biden — who probably wanted to avoid uncomfortable questions regarding the facility’s origins while he was the sitting vice president. I was the political director of a statewide immigrant rights organization at the time, and part of my job was to help coordinate visits to this facility by different campaigns and to generate media coverage of the mistreatment of minors we knew was happening within its walls.
The facility was closed not too long after that, and it was celebrated by politicians and talking heads associated with the Democratic Party as a resounding victory against Trump-era anti-immigrant policies.
Five years later, Democratic politicians sound increasingly like Trump when debating immigration. After a military aid package to Ukraine faced Republican obstruction, the Biden administration decided to play four-dimensional chess and proposed combining it into so-called border security. Since Republicans have tied so much of their political identity to curtailing immigration into the country, this political play would be the sweetener that would dislodge military aid from legislative gridlock.
While lobbying Congress for passage of the bill, President Biden said it would give him the authority to “shut down the border on day one.” The proposal would have gutted the asylum system by creating a rushed and tougher process for asylum seekers, requiring them to adjudicate their claims within six months and meet higher requirements for approval. It sought to revive failed Trump-era policies like Title 42 and the construction of the border wall. If the border sees more than 8,500 entries per day, it would automatically be shut down under the bill, and the same would happen if there are 5,000 entries per day, on a rolling seven-day basis. It would have provided $3.2 billion to expand immigrant detention, including private prisons.
However, the deal collapsed after weeks of secret negotiations between the White House and a small group of senators that included Republican James Lankford, Democrat Chris Murphy and Independent Kyrsten Sinema. The proposal died before it could even get a vote in either chamber of Congress. Its failure preserved our asylum system and the international right to seek refuge, as the proposal would have enacted the most restrictive set of immigration policies in decades.
"four-dimensional chess"
Biden's too old to play chess.
You must log in or register to comment.
Democrats have abandoned the ceasefire voters and are going all-in on Nikki Haley voters. 😂
I would put a shocked pikachu here, but they really have gone beyond what I excepted as far as rhetoric goes. Like Biden saying "illegals" isn't something I would have expected, they usually try to have a facade of being nice (while still enacting the same policies ofc).
I've seen it. The mask of humanity fall from capital. It has to take it off to kill everyone—everything you love; all the hope and tenderness in the world. It has to take it off, just for one second. To do the deed. And then you see it. As it strangles and beats your friends to death... the sweetest, most courageous people in the world... ... ... You see the fear and power in its eyes. Then you know.
What? That the bourgeois are not human.
Another excerpt from the middle part of the article:
Biden claimed during the 2020 election cycle that he would undo the aggressive policies of the Trump administration and usher in a more humane approach. In his first days in office, Biden stopped construction of the border wall. He ended the Trump-era travel bans. He created the Family Reunification Task Force to find and reunify those families separated under the Trump administration. He reinstated DACA, shielding Dreamers from deportation. Biden has granted Temporary Protected Status to benefit people from various countries facing political and environmental strife.
All that work is being squandered by Democrats panicking over the loss of support among voters who disapprove of Israel’s genocide of Palestinians in Gaza and the cost-of-living crisis still gripping large parts of the country. As Democrats bleed young, progressive, and Arab voters, it’s clear that party strategists have made a conscious decision to try and replace them with suburban voters who lean conservative or independent. As now-Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said in 2016, “For every blue-collar Democrat we lose in western Pennsylvania, we will pick up two moderate Republicans in the suburbs in Philadelphia, and you can repeat that in Ohio and Illinois and Wisconsin.”
The saddest part is that all of this right-wing backlash is driven largely by the media and bad-faith political actors. Immigrants are not just good for the country; they are essential to keeping the economy afloat and growing. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that the U.S. economy is expected to grow by about $7 trillion and federal revenues by about $1 trillion due to the surge in immigration. Undocumented immigrants, like my parents for 18 years, pay billions in taxes and help keep Social Security solvent while receiving no benefit in return — a grave injustice.
There’s a huge worker shortage in this country, and sectors of the U.S. economy like agriculture and construction would collapse without migrant workers. Farmworker communities in Florida are becoming ghost towns, and fall festivals were canceled last year after the passage of a state-level anti-immigrant bill that’s driving people to pack their bags and move. It’s all happening because politicians in charge lack the seriousness to propose real solutions and instead attempt to deflect from their inability to do their jobs by turning people against other people. Meanwhile, we have places like Pittsburgh, where Mayor Ed Gainey is begging red state governors to send migrant buses his way to shore up the city’s labor force and increase diversity.
What we should be doing instead of trying to cocoon ourselves within our borders is creating an orderly and humane immigration system. Instead of looking the other way at corporate actors who employ undocumented workers without any labor standards, oversight, or protections from wage theft, let’s bring those workers out of the shadows and integrate them into the formal economy. In the absence of action by Congress, the Biden administration should use its existing executive authority to expedite work permits for people who are coming here to earn a living, adequately resource and staff agencies to reduce immigration backlogs, and resource municipalities so that they can welcome migrants.
What we got instead is a shortsighted bill that shifts the Overton window on immigration further to the right and funds more wars that are increasingly unpopular with the U.S. electorate. It’s perverse that the U.S. continues to destabilize whole regions of the world, particularly in the Middle East, creating more refugees, and then when those people seek refuge in the U.S., turns them away.
I want to go out and troll democrats pushing the "You have to support Biden because Trump is worse" line by using this to argue that republicans are currently standing between democrats and both a draconian expansion of immigration policing and a dangerous escalation of the conflict in Ukraine.
Of course, if we're not being politically naive, we understand that the reason that they're doing it is because they know they'll be able to do all much worse once they're in power again, and making the democrats look ineffectual at everything that they do has worked so far, so why stop now?
What is confusing here is why the Democrats still think that means they should try to outflank the republicans on the right. The republican voter isn't stupid, they know playbook at this point and will continue to pull the lever for Rs regardless of what they do or don't do. There's nothing to be gained there; immigration is purely a red meat play, the typical suburban swing voter might make noises about immigration but it's not something they actually care about above other priorities. This isn't four-dimensional chess, it's boring reverse psychology briar patching and the embarrassing thing is nobody's taking the bait.
The actual play is to use procedural shenanigans to steamroll republicans, get your agenda (the good one) in anyway, and look tough for the easily buffaloed. But that'll never happen because that's not what the democratic party's donors want.
Frankly, immigration policing is an attack on democracy and the new slate of legislation attacks what little democratic rights we have in the most blatant way possible.
The article linked a wild video with Al Sharpton and Chris Murphy: https://twitter.com/thereval/status/1754743276823830823
The entire time I was watching it there was just this voice in my head saying, over and over, "fascism. fascism. fascism. this is fascism. what the fuck this is fascism." Like holy fuck how quickly this switch flips where we have these dems talking like they're on the worst of fox news.
