Couldn't even be bothered to not have "both sides" below the fold, they're really expecting me to pay to read the rest of the article.
The "critical" part of critical support: the one-child policy was shitty and led to a bunch of bad knock-on effects, I'm happy they got rid of it after 2015; there is for sure a lot more work to be done on this front
The "support" part of critical support: Lmao, you can just get an abortion in china unlike the US, it was blanket legalized in 1988 (with aditional stipulations depending on the province). You can't equivocate a country where people are getting progressively more rights with another country where people are losing progressively more rights.
edit: as one of our wonderful posters points out, limited legal abortion was available since 1953
The original article is here I use a paywall removing browser addon that works particularly well on Firefox. Will paste full text shortly.
I was genuinely shocked when I read that in the decision, like we are 5 years away from doing HUAC again.
I know they mentioned Canada in the decision, though they didn't single them out, but Canada has one of the most liberal policies on abortion in the world. In most provinces it's no-questions-asked up to 20 or 23 weeks, and afterwards it's a medical decision with the doctor. And all abortion care is payed for by the single-payer system.