please advise

    • Shoegazer [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It depends on your threat level. If you’re in hog county and you’re not a visibly straight white guy, you could benefit from both. But if your neighborhood is safe but you travel to another city for work where it’s more hostile, then a handgun might serve you better.

      M&P 2.0s have been on sale under $400 and that’s quite a steal for an extremely underrated gun which have been compared favorably to Glocks

      However, I highly suggest you don’t spend the entire $1000 on a single gun. You will need ammo and potentially a safe. A good safe and beginner’s stockpile will cost over $500 total. So personally, if I had $1000, it would be pistol, safe, and ammo. (AR ammo tends to be more expensive and you will get less)

      Alternatively, you can go for a .22 rifle for training. But if you plan on defense and can’t afford to buy multiple guns, I’d stick to just getting a defensive gun i.e. 9mm pistol

      • The_Walkening [none/use name]
        ·
        2 years ago

        A good safe

        Absolutely second this, esp for a pistol

        Glocks are good if you want something with cheap magazines (you can occasionally find cheapo 30-rounder sticks for $10 and Glock factory magazines are cheap compared to other OEM pistol magazines) and a lot of aftermarket support. Older .40 caliber models can also be converted to 9mm and they're pretty plentiful used.

          • The_Walkening [none/use name]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Yeah some companies are a lot worse than others with that; also lots of pistol-caliber carbines use Glock mags so it's a bit less of a spendy proposition to buy one if you've already got the feeding devices handy.

    • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      depends what you want it for

      AR-15 is a good all-rounder, or so i've been told

      but if you need something to carry with you, Nako suggested a handgun