It’s also very idealist and great person of history brained.
Executive leaders are just a cog in their nation state’s apparatus. Rarely do they have much ability to change anything, if they don’t go along with what the machine wants they get spit out. The entire structure and mechanisms of state and capital are much more powerful than any specific capitalist leader
This concept that women would be less violent world leaders is just such a bizarrely sexist take.
There is no innate feature of the female body that makes them less prone to geopolitical conflict, lmfao.
deleted by creator
Did somebody say...War?
:hillgasm: When you destroy Libya so you are the last Lib remaining.
:hillary-contempt: Next up: Liberia.
The funniest part is that lib who lib claimed Boudicca was an example to support the point. Siri, are massacres justified/non-violent?
Oh yeah? What about England under Queen Victoria? Oh wait
It’s also very idealist and great person of history brained.
Executive leaders are just a cog in their nation state’s apparatus. Rarely do they have much ability to change anything, if they don’t go along with what the machine wants they get spit out. The entire structure and mechanisms of state and capital are much more powerful than any specific capitalist leader
deleted by creator