the people who "look down on the West" have increased to 41.7 percent

    • CheGueBeara [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      You're telking yourself more lies to avoid self-crit and hiding behind trolling to avoid the substance I've provided. Your actions disprove your baby rhetoric.

      There's a reason everyone told you to go back to :reddit-logo:. You're acting like a lib that can't do self-crit about their reactionary positions. We've all seen and experienced it, this is a life raft from a subreddit lol.

      I hope you can someday learn how to engage rather than hide behind pretenses of trolling and deflection.

        • CheGueBeara [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          The criticisms of your behavior that you deflect and the fact that you're spreading Western chauvinism from clearly uncritically-accepted capitalist propaganda. You've clearly never even spoken to a Chinese person nor attempted to investigate this topic, but were happy to wade into this space of comrades that do both and start flinging shit and throwing tantrums when people try to engage with you.

          For example, rather than actually engage with my in no way unique accusation that you're being chauvinist, you tried to look the term to in the dictionary to "own me", lol. I offered to explain it to you if you'd stop acting in bad faith, but alas you've doubled down on pretending that you're trolling me. Let me reiterate: I feel great. The only negative emotion I feel about this interaction is pity that you think you're a comrade and are very active here, yet act like this when confronted.

          Fighting the capitalists isn't just memes and sarcasm, you have to shut the fuck up about shit you've never learned and go learn it or ask questions when people make themselves resources for you if you want to contribute. Otherwise, you will simply be disruptive and push us in liberal and reactionary directions and it would be better if you were not here. That behavior would be helpful to us if you brought it to some liberal party.

          • zxcvbnm [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            Pray tell, what is your definition of chauvinist?

            • CheGueBeara [he/him]
              ·
              2 years ago

              My condition was that you demonstrate good faith first. But I'll still help a little anyways: it's not my definition. We're in a socialist space, a commie space, full of ancoms and Marxists. There is a very long history of how this term is used in those movements and here.

              How will you be demonstrating good faith?

              • zxcvbnm [he/him]
                ·
                2 years ago

                I think US hegemony is by far much worse than China. I think the world would be much better with China taking a lead role, providing better alternatives like better financing(the debt trap stuff is a myth that really applies to the IMF) and the BRI. China has the best chance of spreading socialism around the world and progressing us toward communism.

                That doesn't mean we have to turn of the critical part of our brains and act like there are never mistakes. I don't bad mouth China in liberal spaces like Reddit. In fact, they often call me a tankie on Reddit.

                • CheGueBeara [he/him]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Is this your example of demonstrating good faith? Maybe I should be clearer: the impetus that made you deflect and pretend at trolling is the bad faith. The flinging of shit and then expecting everyone to correct you otherwise they are good targets of criticism is the bad faith. Are you going to stop doing that, and why should I believe you? Not being a consistent sinophobe or declaring critical support doesn't really address my concern. I have no faith that when I start explaining, you'll engage rather than dismiss and troll and deflect. You have to establish the trust that you've broken in this space. That is the lesson I think you need to learn the most.

            • CheGueBeara [he/him]
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’ve read all the resources other people have provided (you still haven’t provided anything).

              1. I don't believe you, at least you certainly only demonstrated ignorance and attempts at deflection when responding to others providing you with sources. Maybe you decided to read them later, maybe you skimmed them to see how to confirm your biases. But it's painfully obvious that you've never spoken to a Chinese person and aren't comprehending the condescension towards every Chinese person that you're spreading in ignorance.

              2. I personally prefer to not offer resources to people acting in bad faith. They, like you, are actually in a mode of thinking that's about having a fight and "winning" rather than actually learning anything or building a shared understaffing, which is exemplified by your deflections and attempts at trolling every person who's tried to help you. Like you said, others already tried that and it obviously didn't work. You weren't receptive.

              This is a good summary of the behavior: https://hexbear.net/post/206695/comment/2608679. I would further summarize it as flinging shit in ignorance and then demanding everyone disprove you, then acting like a baby when they try to meet your ridiculous expectations.

              It’s not chauvinism to state facts like unarmed civilians were shot

              1. You've already proven that you don't know what chauvinism is in this context, so this is an interesting and indirect form of lying. You don't know what I was saying, so you wouldn't be able to tell me whether this counts. You're not going to be able to critically engage with this topic until you stop treating it like a reddit fight.

              2. Civilians were shot, though calling them "unarmed civilians" creates a misleading context, as we generally don't know what activities they were engaged in during the fighting, mostly in side streets. A teenager just walking home with groceries and someone part of a lynch mob can both be unarmed civilians, and both were present.

              3. The only extent to which you've previously engaged on this claim, so far as I can tell, is with some garbage articles that can't even get basic facts right.

              My verdict: this actually seems pretty in line with chauvinism, actually.

              or China censors sensitive topics like what happened in 1989

              Ah, how the goal posts move. Now it's just whether China has censorship regarding topics like this? Fucking lol. That's a far cry from your chauvinist pretense that Chinese people aren't allowed to talk about it, holy shit.

              I’d much rather see US hegemony fall and China take the lead. You are just kneejerk reacting, making assumptions about me.

              I'm correctly describing your bad faith behavior and recognizing, as others have, that it's some:reddit-logo: brain shit.

              So was this your idea of demonstrating good faith or...?

                • CheGueBeara [he/him]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  No, you offered defenses of yourself that, I would guess, you think of as establishing common ground. That doesn't make me feel like you'll react in good faith, believe it or not.

                • CheGueBeara [he/him]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Ah, and you've yet again avoided engaging with what I said to just be dismissive, lol. I quote you and engage at length with explanations and your brain goes, "hey fuck you why are you contradicting me?"