• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml
    hexagon
    ·
    9 months ago

    I would argue that they are ineffective in a sense that they're too complex, too expensive to produce, and too hard to maintain in the field. The inefficiency of these systems doesn't matter when beating up on a much smaller opponent, but it becomes a huge problem when going up against a peer competitor.

    I very much agree that weapons should be looked at as consumables in a peer conflict, and that's precisely what makes US weapons inefficient. It's more expensive and more time consuming to produce them, and they're not as durable as Soviet style weapons Russia is using.

    Incidentally, recent French military report notes that Western equipment is considered less efficient than Soviet due to maintenance issues and degraded mode capabilities..