I don't know about accuracy, but the newer one is easier to read (the 1963 edition uses more old-fashioned terminology and phrasing). But skip the foreword by Homi K. Bhabha; it's shit.
The only thing Sartre wrote that's worth reading tbhq (j/k, I want to read his critique of dialectical reason if I ever have the time. But I would not recommend his Sein und Zeit fanfiction)
I don't know about accuracy, but the newer one is easier to read (the 1963 edition uses more old-fashioned terminology and phrasing). But skip the foreword by Homi K. Bhabha; it's shit.
The introduction by Sartre is dope tho imo.
absolutely
That's the one I read, thought it was pretty good.
The only thing Sartre wrote that's worth reading tbhq (j/k, I want to read his critique of dialectical reason if I ever have the time. But I would not recommend his Sein und Zeit fanfiction)