• zifnab25 [he/him, any]
    ·
    9 months ago

    Both physical and digital Switch games include what Nintendo calls technological protection measures, or TPMs. As Nintendo itself explains in one of those takedown notices, "When a game is started on the Nintendo Switch console a Game TPM is decrypted using cryptographic keys that are protected by Console TPMs. The games themselves can then be decrypted by the decrypted Game TPMs so the game can be played."

    The DMCA includes a section that says "no person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title." In other words, any attempt to bypass DRM is a violation of copyright law no matter the intent - or at least, that's how Nintendo interprets the law, and that argument has been very effective at getting hosts like GitHub to take down software like Lockpick and SigPatch-Updater.

    Love to live in a society where private property is real and personal property is not.

    • WolfLink@lemmy.ml
      ·
      9 months ago

      Their strategy isn’t really the legal arguments, it’s simply scare tactics because no one wants to go against Nintendo in court.

      • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yep, basically their strategy is intimidation by being rich when the people deving these things aren’t. The legal costs are nothing for them and decimating for their opponents.

        Shameful practice, but super common in the modern world.

        • max_dryzen@mander.xyz
          ·
          9 months ago

          'We operate in that space between what the law says and our opponent's access to what the law says...'

    • Moonworm [any]
      ·
      9 months ago

      "When a game is started on the Nintendo Switch console a Game TPM is decrypted using cryptographic keys that are protected by Console TPMs. The games themselves can then be decrypted by the decrypted Game TPMs so the game can be played."

      Statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged.

      • MajinBlayze [any, he/him]
        ·
        9 months ago

        It's called a "Key Encryption Key" or KEK (yes, really)

        It's not exactly a new concept in cryptography.

        https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/key_encryption_key

    • glans [it/its]
      ·
      9 months ago

      Cory Doctorow quotes someone else whose name I forget who calls this "criminal contempt of business model".

  • QuillcrestFalconer [he/him]
    ·
    9 months ago

    Given how fucking atrocious copyright law is, is kind of a miracle that emulation is not technically ilegal

      • GinAndJuche
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Japan is a fascist hell state where the police either frame you or label the crime as not a crime because they don’t have a golden lath to convicting.

        Probably one of the few places on par with America in terms of injustice systems.

        Based on what I’ve read at least.

    • buckykat [none/use name]
      ·
      9 months ago

      The precedent from bleem is literally that emulation is legal but defending it in court will bankrupt you