Shucks, I wanted to do some dialectics and do "landlords as sparrows," but that's against the content policy, too. No "hateful symbols, negative stereotypes, comparing certain groups to animals/objects, or otherwise expressing or promoting hate based on identity."
Sure. But it's the kind of thing that makes my lib friends think I'm doing a hecking fascist dehumanism when I say cops are pigs or landlords are leeches. The rule is fine, it's the way it's interpreted that's a forehead-slapper.
Oh yeah I agree. They're just succumbing to the "BUT WHAT ABOUT THE REVERSE RACISM?" argument about hypocrisy. You could just enforce it for the racism and the racism-only but people will complain and they don't want to deal with that.
Shucks, I wanted to do some dialectics and do "landlords as sparrows," but that's against the content policy, too. No "hateful symbols, negative stereotypes, comparing certain groups to animals/objects, or otherwise expressing or promoting hate based on identity."
https://labs.openai.com/policies/content-policy
Man fuck anyone, to death, who thinks "landlord" should be a protected identity
That's going to be a blanket "don't turn humans into animals" policy to stop racist monkey stuff I'm guessing.
Sure. But it's the kind of thing that makes my lib friends think I'm doing a hecking fascist dehumanism when I say cops are pigs or landlords are leeches. The rule is fine, it's the way it's interpreted that's a forehead-slapper.
Oh yeah I agree. They're just succumbing to the "BUT WHAT ABOUT THE REVERSE RACISM?" argument about hypocrisy. You could just enforce it for the racism and the racism-only but people will complain and they don't want to deal with that.
well what the fuck am i supposed to do with it if i can't make it infer a fursona for communist leaders?