it doesn't seem that bizarre. the comparison point at the time was physical albums, which were more expensive. unless you mean in the broader sense of "digital goods are weird because they don't cost anything to copy once they've been made"?
of course. just, at the time, no one thought that sort of thing would be even remotely possible. it's like how Netflix only succeeded because of piracy. neither music labels nor cable companies were going to give up an ounce of profit until people decided to steal that shit instead. the idea of a single subscription service seemed like a pipe dream back then.
it doesn't seem that bizarre. the comparison point at the time was physical albums, which were more expensive. unless you mean in the broader sense of "digital goods are weird because they don't cost anything to copy once they've been made"?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
of course. just, at the time, no one thought that sort of thing would be even remotely possible. it's like how Netflix only succeeded because of piracy. neither music labels nor cable companies were going to give up an ounce of profit until people decided to steal that shit instead. the idea of a single subscription service seemed like a pipe dream back then.