Fucker_Dairy [he/him,they/them] to Science • 2 years agoThese two articles are literally talking about the same fucking study lmaoimagemessage-square17 fedilinkarrow-up1148
arrow-up1148imageThese two articles are literally talking about the same fucking study lmaoFucker_Dairy [he/him,they/them] to Science • 2 years agomessage-square17 Commentsfedilink
minus-squareUtter_Karate [he/him, comrade/them]hexbear17·2 years agoI'm not sure I would classify "may or may not" as a study result. link
minus-squareBigAssBlueBug [they/them]hexbear12·2 years agoThat would just mean an inconclusive result, requiring more study, most people dont even publish null result studies so we, the public, never get to see them, and why there is an incentive to fusge data to get a non-null result link
minus-squarehexaflexagonbear [he/him]hexbear4·2 years agoI mean, technically as long as the probability you're infections is less than 100% and greater than 0% that's kinda true. link
I'm not sure I would classify "may or may not" as a study result.
That would just mean an inconclusive result, requiring more study, most people dont even publish null result studies so we, the public, never get to see them, and why there is an incentive to fusge data to get a non-null result
I mean, technically as long as the probability you're infections is less than 100% and greater than 0% that's kinda true.