like the whole article is explicitly aimed at columnist twitter users, and people here said "oh my god does she mean me??? is she trying to tell me that my problems aren't real and i'm not valid??" so who is really identifying with the New York columnist here
who who is really identifying with the New York columnist here
You don't have to identify with them to go this far out of your way to defend their smarmy privileged position and selectively dig out a tiny part of it and polish it so it looks like "organize or die!" while doing kind of the opposite of that in the comments by being divisively hostile and condescending to the rest of us.
Apparently people need to organize 100% of the time or die, except you, where you have the very important task of being so self-important and condescending to the rest of us that you are either unintentionally terrible at rallying people together or you're deliberately doing... something. Whatever it is, it isn't good but it has the same energy as the New York columnist.
Maybe you should be pen pals with the columnist. In that way, you two can look down on the rest of us little people and wonder why your superior intellects and sigma grindsets don't get the respect you think they deserve here.
like how exactly am i supposed to be convinced to take you seriously
How exactly am I supposed to take you seriously when you're being this condescending and hostile to pretty much everyone in this thread, which is not unlike the columnist? Just how well is organizing going to go if the organizer is going to act like you?
exactly, i’m smarter than you, better than you, cooler than you, and fuck more than you. so are you gonna do something about it or are you just gonna agree with me.
They've already expressed a sense of kinship with the New York columnist so we're just the little people here, unlike :galaxy-brain: there.
like the whole article is explicitly aimed at columnist twitter users, and people here said "oh my god does she mean me??? is she trying to tell me that my problems aren't real and i'm not valid??" so who is really identifying with the New York columnist here
You don't have to identify with them to go this far out of your way to defend their smarmy privileged position and selectively dig out a tiny part of it and polish it so it looks like "organize or die!" while doing kind of the opposite of that in the comments by being divisively hostile and condescending to the rest of us.
Apparently people need to organize 100% of the time or die, except you, where you have the very important task of being so self-important and condescending to the rest of us that you are either unintentionally terrible at rallying people together or you're deliberately doing... something. Whatever it is, it isn't good but it has the same energy as the New York columnist.
Maybe you should be pen pals with the columnist. In that way, you two can look down on the rest of us little people and wonder why your superior intellects and sigma grindsets don't get the respect you think they deserve here.
i'm sorry
:doubt:
Removed by mod
How exactly am I supposed to take you seriously when you're being this condescending and hostile to pretty much everyone in this thread, which is not unlike the columnist? Just how well is organizing going to go if the organizer is going to act like you?
:debate-me-debate-me:
:expert-shapiro:
:PIGPOOPBALLS: