Because we're not agreeing with the totally clear and totally obvious and totally present and not open to interpretation article from the New Yorker columnist that has multiple similarly smug and condescendingly titled articles that seem hostile toward the poor and disadvantaged, or just look that way. We can't read the intentions as liberal insulation and condescension toward the poor and disadvantaged unless we have presumably read all of them, or at the least we have to agree with takes provided by professional organizers that are smarter than us, better than us, cooler than us, and fuck more than us or else we didn't turn our brains on. :very-intelligent:
Because we're not agreeing with the totally clear and totally obvious and totally present and not open to interpretation article from the New Yorker columnist that has multiple similarly smug and condescendingly titled articles that seem hostile toward the poor and disadvantaged, or just look that way. We can't read the intentions as liberal insulation and condescension toward the poor and disadvantaged unless we have presumably read all of them, or at the least we have to agree with takes provided by professional organizers that are smarter than us, better than us, cooler than us, and fuck more than us or else we didn't turn our brains on. :very-intelligent: