The socialists you call "Nazbols" - Nazbolism isn't actually a thing btw - don't associate with Leftism. MLs don't call ourselves leftists because leftists are just radlibs and left unity is a Trotskyoid psy-op. You are liberals who appropriate socialist aesthetics. You lot have more in common with Obama than you do with any socialist. You would reject participation in any historical socialist revolution because none of them would make enough overtures to liberal idpol to appease you. Mao, like every other socialist revolutionary, thought patriotism was intrinsic to ML. This is one reason why MLs don't support westoid left-trenderism. Every socialist society except maybe GDR has been socially conservative and look how GDR ended up. The LGBT movement is Malthusian and anti-communist in practice. There's a reason U.S. embassies all over the world fly the Pride flag. The LGBT movement is an anti-communist, Malthusian psyop. This kind of garbage is Cointelpro in action. The only proletarian relationship is a heterosexual one that produces children. Go read The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State if you want to cleanse your mind of liberal removed. Stalin had queers and hookers shot without trial btw. MAGA rightists are gonna succeed in their revolution before you lot do because they're better organized, more numerous, and are more willing to fight and die for what they believe in. Idpol shitlibs don't care about class war and admit so themselves when they say they wouldn't join a revolution that doesn't worship trnnies, they hate the masses and they hate the working class because the vast majority of us simply don't want to suck trnny dick which is an unforgiveable offense to removed porn-brained libtards. You lot would call Stalin and Mao nazbols if you lived during their era. Congrats, you've read this in the ten seconds before the malding mods delete it for talking about inconvenient (for deranged liberals) historical truths.

My dude thinks MAGA is going to do a revolution :farquaad-point: MAGA couldn't even do anything with the capitol building on Jan 6th even though they were practically handed it on a silver plate. :pathetic: Also what are they going to revolt against? The status quo is already far-right.

Imagine having LGBT-phobia that would make Hitler blush and still thinking you're a communist. This shit is some hilarious brain worms.

  • commiecapybara [he/him, e/em/eir]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Okay, last I'm gonna say on this, but Mao specifically states that

    The specific content of patriotism is determined by historical conditions. There is the "patriotism" of the Japanese aggressors and of Hitler, and there is our patriotism. Communists must resolutely oppose the "patriotism" of the Japanese aggressors and of Hitler. [...]For only by fighting in defense of the motherland can we defeat the aggressors and achieve national liberation. And only by achieving national liberation will it be possible for the proletariat and other working people to achieve their own emancipation. The victory of China and the defeat of the invading imperialists will help the people of other countries. Thus in wars of national liberation patriotism is applied internationalism.

    Under this context, 'patriotism' in a socialist context refers to achieving national liberation during times of war, NOT Patsocs' idea of socially conservative nationalism (i.e. 'patriotism' of imperialism and fascism) .

    • Alaskaball [comrade/them]A
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is complimented by the Stalin Era's patriotism. It is the patriotism of the people under siege of external forces of Imperialists and fascists. The cases of each socialist state or movement promoting socialist patriotism is the case of the defense of the people's dictatorship / people's war for national liberation from foreign Capital's bourgeoise dictatorships.

      Key word there is "Defense of the people's dictatorship", "people's war for national liberation" and "Against foreign Capital's bourgeoise dictatorships".

      There has not historically been a successful case of a socialist movement utilizing any kind of patriotism in the overthrow of an imperialist state.

      It would be fine if there were socialist groups that wanted to experiment with seeing whether or not utilizing such tactics can work as a means of applying their group's theories of 'socialist patriotism' to the rigors of real life organizing in an imperialist state, as that's the purpose of the socialist movement to encourage the development of the most advanced socialist theory proven through material practice within their own countries. One can see this in the steady growth of the Communist Party of Britain, and the steady decline of the Communist Party of Great Britain - Marxist Leninist. One has a better grasp of the material conditions of their country, whereas the other is trapped in their perception of the material conditions of their country.