Posting non-horny discussion of extremely horny topics in such a way that it makes everyone painfully uncomfortable
When you said "pornbrained" I was like "aw cmon how bad can it be"?
My problem (personally) is this is extremely cursed posting but it's also a pretty good bit. Aside from "cis het women must take up a vow of chastity" I know it's a bit but this feels like misogyny with extra steps.
However, when you said "having their 'man' 'stolen' by someone with a phallus" I mean, the language is fuckin atrocious but I giggled picturing the chad transfemme stealing some subby bisexual guy from a seething cishet lady, so bravo.
Yeah. Basically wanted to convey the outlawing of cishetero sexuality when viewed from the perspective of a pornbrained cishet. But yeah I can do better. And yeah I tried using ambiguous language that could be used to insinuate a cis het terfs nightmare, it tickled me as I was writing it. The 'cis het women must be chaste' was to allude to Nuns and to also make sure cishetero normative culture comes to a halt as now no straighties would be breeding, giving rise to BISEXUAL DOMINANCE. Could've been written way way better but I'm a college dropout and have brainworms that still need fishing out and examination. I really do apologize for my poor choice of wording and coming off as a bit misogynistic.
My only other saving grace is that it's badposting and I'm doing my part.
It's solid, I did have a laugh whilst holding my head and murmuring "What the actual fuck am I reading, what an awful day to have eyes". If pressed, I'd have said that cishet women have to watch their men be ANALLY EMASCULATED, which is A) extremely crass, but B) leaves the man-stealer open to be anyone the reader can envision: trans lady with a strap-on? World's funniest transmasc enby? The possibilities are endless! "Person with phallus" feels limiting, I guess. I can see your logic & I do appreciate this bit, atrocious & horrifying as it is.
You make me wonder if I should try posting my critique of the vivisection smut here...
vivisection smut
Idk what all this entails but I'm definitely imagining something like someone in the process of doing a meatotomy (I think that's how it's spelled).
Otherwise yeah. It is a bit limiting. So I've posted before about it, I've never been pegged. I've taken dick and love it but it's like a whole thing. Like it has to be a certain girth so I can even imagine having a handsfree orgasm. I also like giving pleasure. A lot. So because I know there are nerve endings in a penis I'm going to enjoy bottoming for a penis haver (if they're girthy enough). Now I've heard it's still pleasurable for someone who's been afab to use a strap-on. I just know I ain't sucking on it because it's like cranking a box filled with sand, doesn't really do anything imo. Like it'd lube it up, but I'd rather actual lube so I don't get a tear. I'd be open to it but have only met one woman who offered (who was also bi and didn't try to erase my sexuality, but also think she didn't like me slowly feeling out my flamboyance, so there's that) but as I get porked by the real thing I declined, plus I was always busy getting her to climax anyways. So I think it comes down to my limited experiences and trying to rush through a post.
Don't get what causes allos to be so weird and oversharey like this. I'd get shamed out of a room for oversharing about some totally harmless special interest, and yet. It's beyond strange, like not only did I not ask for sex life details, I also did not volunteer any of my own. Why do allosexuals think it's normal to describe their personal kinks or sex acts or whatever at people, in graphic detail, appropos of nothing? Is that normal? Horrifying reality, not how it should be.
I will not ever question the wisdom of the volcel people's vanguard again.
How was it appropos of nothing? We were talking about blowing out some theoretical dudes back and I shared my ignorance and flaws when it comes to the totality of sexuality and reasons why that might be. Idk man. Back to lurking.
Were we, allos are just built different. Don't seem to have the disconnect between "discussing sex things at a remove" and "instantly horny and overpersonal", I guess. Woes of asexuality.
Ngl, I read less than a sentence of your comment. I ain't gonna read that. My comrade in christ, doing a goofy bit does not imply that I desire to hear your sexual history.
I'm not trying to be incredibly cruel, I'm not a complete asshole, I simply have boundaries when it comes to talking sex, which I guess are different to every othet person's.
I'm not horny though. I'm just talking about sex and sexuality and yes a little sexual history as it does shape experience and my being. Go off though. Literally gonna delete everything and won't be back. Be better for everyone I suppose.
Posting non-horny discussion of extremely horny topics in such a way that it makes everyone painfully uncomfortable
When you said "pornbrained" I was like "aw cmon how bad can it be"?
My problem (personally) is this is extremely cursed posting but it's also a pretty good bit. Aside from "cis het women must take up a vow of chastity" I know it's a bit but this feels like misogyny with extra steps.
However, when you said "having their 'man' 'stolen' by someone with a phallus" I mean, the language is fuckin atrocious but I giggled picturing the chad transfemme stealing some subby bisexual guy from a seething cishet lady, so bravo.
In short,
Yeah. Basically wanted to convey the outlawing of cishetero sexuality when viewed from the perspective of a pornbrained cishet. But yeah I can do better. And yeah I tried using ambiguous language that could be used to insinuate a cis het terfs nightmare, it tickled me as I was writing it. The 'cis het women must be chaste' was to allude to Nuns and to also make sure cishetero normative culture comes to a halt as now no straighties would be breeding, giving rise to BISEXUAL DOMINANCE. Could've been written way way better but I'm a college dropout and have brainworms that still need fishing out and examination. I really do apologize for my poor choice of wording and coming off as a bit misogynistic.
My only other saving grace is that it's badposting and I'm doing my part.
More cursed shit
It's solid, I did have a laugh whilst holding my head and murmuring "What the actual fuck am I reading, what an awful day to have eyes". If pressed, I'd have said that cishet women have to watch their men be ANALLY EMASCULATED, which is A) extremely crass, but B) leaves the man-stealer open to be anyone the reader can envision: trans lady with a strap-on? World's funniest transmasc enby? The possibilities are endless! "Person with phallus" feels limiting, I guess. I can see your logic & I do appreciate this bit, atrocious & horrifying as it is.
Otherwise yeah. It is a bit limiting. So I've posted before about it, I've never been pegged. I've taken dick and love it but it's like a whole thing. Like it has to be a certain girth so I can even imagine having a handsfree orgasm. I also like giving pleasure. A lot. So because I know there are nerve endings in a penis I'm going to enjoy bottoming for a penis haver (if they're girthy enough). Now I've heard it's still pleasurable for someone who's been afab to use a strap-on. I just know I ain't sucking on it because it's like cranking a box filled with sand, doesn't really do anything imo. Like it'd lube it up, but I'd rather actual lube so I don't get a tear. I'd be open to it but have only met one woman who offered (who was also bi and didn't try to erase my sexuality, but also think she didn't like me slowly feeling out my flamboyance, so there's that) but as I get porked by the real thing I declined, plus I was always busy getting her to climax anyways. So I think it comes down to my limited experiences and trying to rush through a post.
OKAY WOW TMI ✨
Don't get what causes allos to be so weird and oversharey like this. I'd get shamed out of a room for oversharing about some totally harmless special interest, and yet. It's beyond strange, like not only did I not ask for sex life details, I also did not volunteer any of my own. Why do allosexuals think it's normal to describe their personal kinks or sex acts or whatever at people, in graphic detail, appropos of nothing? Is that normal? Horrifying reality, not how it should be.
I will not ever question the wisdom of the volcel people's vanguard again.
How was it appropos of nothing? We were talking about blowing out some theoretical dudes back and I shared my ignorance and flaws when it comes to the totality of sexuality and reasons why that might be. Idk man. Back to lurking.
Were we, allos are just built different. Don't seem to have the disconnect between "discussing sex things at a remove" and "instantly horny and overpersonal", I guess. Woes of asexuality.
Ngl, I read less than a sentence of your comment. I ain't gonna read that. My comrade in christ, doing a goofy bit does not imply that I desire to hear your sexual history.
I'm not trying to be incredibly cruel, I'm not a complete asshole, I simply have boundaries when it comes to talking sex, which I guess are different to every othet person's.
I'm not horny though. I'm just talking about sex and sexuality and yes a little sexual history as it does shape experience and my being. Go off though. Literally gonna delete everything and won't be back. Be better for everyone I suppose.
I did not ask & given that I'm pretty sure I have a right to feel weird about it.