I don't think you understand what I am saying. I don't think this is just merely an ill advised poor form of praxis, I believe this is actively encouraged by liberal ideology specifically because it's toothless and anti-worker
I agree with you that the bourgeoisie push inherently harmless things (to capitalism) as a replacement to stop people turning marxist. This is not the case with antiwork though and it's backed up by what happened with it.
he media immediately took an interesting in cutting off its head. And found the narcissistic top moderator who wanted fame to be a willing idiot. This led to the interview.
Fintech assholes seized the opportunity following this to grab influence over large portions of the community, starting their exodus community which focuses solely on social-democracy.
At the same time neoliberals took advantage of the chaos within the team and the subreddit to get compradors onto the team. Ever since then a slow and steady takeover of the internal team has occurred with multiple internal drama events shaking up the team and allowing neoliberals to rise higher and higher in the hierarchy, they now practically control it.
Antiwork was kneecapped with a baseball bat by these bourgeoise shitbags because it was genuinely helping the left.
You can talk about "liberal ideology" all you want. Our goal isn't to make the masses into marxists, that will not happen, they will always just be the masses who lean one way or another on whims and feelings created by those who succeed in gaining control of any given political situation and current at any particular moment in time. Our goal is to make the masses reach the pre-requisite state of being necessary for us to be able to seize control of them when the right political moment arises. We are a vanguard at the head of the masses not at the head of a well educated and ideologically pure marxist army.
I don't think you understand what I am saying. I don't think this is just merely an ill advised poor form of praxis, I believe this is actively encouraged by liberal ideology specifically because it's toothless and anti-worker
I agree with you that the bourgeoisie push inherently harmless things (to capitalism) as a replacement to stop people turning marxist. This is not the case with antiwork though and it's backed up by what happened with it.
Goldman Sachs named it directly as part of the cause of America's labour problems
he media immediately took an interesting in cutting off its head. And found the narcissistic top moderator who wanted fame to be a willing idiot. This led to the interview.
Fintech assholes seized the opportunity following this to grab influence over large portions of the community, starting their exodus community which focuses solely on social-democracy.
At the same time neoliberals took advantage of the chaos within the team and the subreddit to get compradors onto the team. Ever since then a slow and steady takeover of the internal team has occurred with multiple internal drama events shaking up the team and allowing neoliberals to rise higher and higher in the hierarchy, they now practically control it.
Antiwork was kneecapped with a baseball bat by these bourgeoise shitbags because it was genuinely helping the left.
You can talk about "liberal ideology" all you want. Our goal isn't to make the masses into marxists, that will not happen, they will always just be the masses who lean one way or another on whims and feelings created by those who succeed in gaining control of any given political situation and current at any particular moment in time. Our goal is to make the masses reach the pre-requisite state of being necessary for us to be able to seize control of them when the right political moment arises. We are a vanguard at the head of the masses not at the head of a well educated and ideologically pure marxist army.