• robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    any art made for a corporation was made with exploitation, but that doesn't stop us from watching tv or listening to mainstream music

    barring a reflection you can't know if a gun was pointed at the subject of a photograph, but I don't think i'm further harmed by some new person who i will never meet and cannot identify me seeing a picture of my butthole that someone screenshotted from snapchat or a google engineer illegally copied out of my email.

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      deleted by creator

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
            ·
            2 years ago

            i have no idea what your point was then. if some hentai artist was forced to draw a kink they don't like or scammed out of money they were owed by a publisher, that harm is done and dusted long before the work is scanlated and uploaded somewhere you or I would see it, and we don't compound the harm done by passively copying and observing art.

            • UlyssesT
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
                ·
                2 years ago

                it applies the same way. you don't know who I am or what I look like or which butthole is my butthole so how exactly do you assume any moral culpability from looking at a "stolen" or coerced picture of my butthole?

                • UlyssesT
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  deleted by creator