It looks useful for work, but that's about it, and people keep telling me that it's "plagiarism" or that it's bad and nobody should, I guess, use it all?
I see it as a means of the mass proletarianization and unemployment of artists which in its current state will also lead to a decline in the quality of art. I'm a communist - my solution is guaranteed public funding to art collectives.
It looks like throwup.
No offense or anything.
I agree that human artists intentionally making something that looks psychedelic almost always looks better.
Yeah
I'm just not sure how I feel about AI in general.
It looks useful for work, but that's about it, and people keep telling me that it's "plagiarism" or that it's bad and nobody should, I guess, use it all?
Idk.
I see it as a means of the mass proletarianization and unemployment of artists which in its current state will also lead to a decline in the quality of art. I'm a communist - my solution is guaranteed public funding to art collectives.
AI for art or AI in general?
I was talking about art specifically, but you can apply what I said generally.
sure!