• SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Depends on the sector and impact. Companies which make items/services that are largely inelastic can see it as a boon; and ones which are looking to 'diversify their portfolio' would certainly see it that way, since any companies they'd be trying to acquire would have lower price tags due to deflated stock prices+lowered asset values.

    On the other hand, higher interest rates makes borrowing harder, and a lot of companies saw loans as (nearly) free money for ages, since interest rates have been so low for so long; some companies would just borrow money and then simply beat the (low) interest rate for free money. So I'm sure quite a few are pissed those money pools are drying up.

    • LiberalSocialist [any,they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      This was a really interesting comment thread, btw. Can you recommend some additional reading/videos/podcasts etc. to learn more?

      • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Unfortunately not from my personal experience; I had the misfortune of getting an advanced degree as a bean counter, so I was taught much of this, and textbooks are extremely dry and neglect to connect much of the reasoning behind the framework, or for that matter even having examples outside of a vacuum with 'completely elastic supply and demand' (l m a o) as it were for things such as econ.

        I have heard good things about some of Richard Wolff's work, in particular "Contending Economic Theories: Neoclassical, Keynesian, and Marxian", but I'll leave it to others to comment on that particular piece.

      • duderium [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Aside from Richard Wolff who is mentioned below, I recommend Michael Roberts (https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/) and Michael Hudson (https://michael-hudson.com/). None of them are perfect but they all have interesting takes on economics.