He was not speaking in good faith. But some one on the left in the west that have large base need to step out and go against the war. The latest AOC stunt was horrendous, and let fascist like Tucker to take the anti war narrative is pathetic.
By "the latest AOC stunt", you mean the Tulsi Gabbard redditor crank yelling at her? The stan of Tulsi Gabbard who thinks that the left is being destroyed by cancel culture?
Again Tucker is not antiwar. You are being fooled. Tucker is pro-Russia. He doesn't want ukraine to receiving funding because he supports Russia. Russia is also reactionary and not good and not the USSR.
Fascists have tried to hijack leftists movements since the beginning of fascism. That's what fascists do.
I mean the redditor that said she indirectly pushing us closer nuclear war with a nuclear nation by pumping money into a fascist govt. I think that more important than Tulsi bit. Like seriously, you need to reevaluate yourself if you think pumping more money into Ukraine is a good idea, and not seeking a diplomatic result, like Clare Daly and Mick Wallace. A least the latter using their platform and advocate for diplomatic solution, stop the pumping money and weapons, what the “squad” has done other than towing the state dept line and pumping more money for the fascist govt in Ukraine?
I didn't say any of those things. To think that AOC is responsible or in control for this situation is ungrounded. The fact that the redditor is a Tulsi fan, who is a right wing grifter, should have been a clue for you. Tucker uses AOC as the punching bag of the left. Tucker is only saying that the US shouldn't give funding to Ukraine because he support Russia. Tucker also brings up that the money would be better spent in America, which he is also lying about because he opposes help working class people. He's just lying.
Ukraine and Russia are both reactionary and right wing but there should not be a war because civilians are the victims. There are innocent people being killed.
Again Tucker is not antiwar, he supports Russia. He supports Putin. Tucker is not antiwar. He's not calling out warhawks. You are being fooled. You should recognize this because he's a fascist.
Again, what I asked is what Granit said, the "leftish" in congress, especially the squad should use their platform and advocate for an diplomatic off ramp against a nuclear nation as oppose itching closer to it by pumping money and silent about it. You know what a nuclear war mean, what a third world war mean? Dude, if those two break then no one give two sh*te about who fascist or who not, because we all gonna get annihilated.
This is a clip of AOC saying that she doesn't want to support funding to ukraine because she's antiwar and she's worried about the military industrial complex
He was not speaking in good faith. But some one on the left in the west that have large base need to step out and go against the war. The latest AOC stunt was horrendous, and let fascist like Tucker to take the anti war narrative is pathetic.
By "the latest AOC stunt", you mean the Tulsi Gabbard redditor crank yelling at her? The stan of Tulsi Gabbard who thinks that the left is being destroyed by cancel culture?
Again Tucker is not antiwar. You are being fooled. Tucker is pro-Russia. He doesn't want ukraine to receiving funding because he supports Russia. Russia is also reactionary and not good and not the USSR.
Fascists have tried to hijack leftists movements since the beginning of fascism. That's what fascists do.
I mean the redditor that said she indirectly pushing us closer nuclear war with a nuclear nation by pumping money into a fascist govt. I think that more important than Tulsi bit. Like seriously, you need to reevaluate yourself if you think pumping more money into Ukraine is a good idea, and not seeking a diplomatic result, like Clare Daly and Mick Wallace. A least the latter using their platform and advocate for diplomatic solution, stop the pumping money and weapons, what the “squad” has done other than towing the state dept line and pumping more money for the fascist govt in Ukraine?
I didn't say any of those things. To think that AOC is responsible or in control for this situation is ungrounded. The fact that the redditor is a Tulsi fan, who is a right wing grifter, should have been a clue for you. Tucker uses AOC as the punching bag of the left. Tucker is only saying that the US shouldn't give funding to Ukraine because he support Russia. Tucker also brings up that the money would be better spent in America, which he is also lying about because he opposes help working class people. He's just lying.
Ukraine and Russia are both reactionary and right wing but there should not be a war because civilians are the victims. There are innocent people being killed.
Again Tucker is not antiwar, he supports Russia. He supports Putin. Tucker is not antiwar. He's not calling out warhawks. You are being fooled. You should recognize this because he's a fascist.
Again, what I asked is what Granit said, the "leftish" in congress, especially the squad should use their platform and advocate for an diplomatic off ramp against a nuclear nation as oppose itching closer to it by pumping money and silent about it. You know what a nuclear war mean, what a third world war mean? Dude, if those two break then no one give two sh*te about who fascist or who not, because we all gonna get annihilated.
This is a clip of AOC saying that she doesn't want to support funding to ukraine because she's antiwar and she's worried about the military industrial complex
These are the 2 reactionary clowns that interrupted AOC. One is a Larouchite and the other is a magacommunism patsoc. :funny-clown-hammer: