Doesn't this affirm what Heaven_and_Earth is saying though? That these people's morality is informed by these earlier religious beliefs, and despite converting later they retain those same moral principles unexamined?
I feel like you are not really in disagreement, but maybe I'm misunderstanding your argument.
No, because those earlier beliefs in morality are not actually tied to the 'religion', unless you are attempting to claim that something like Sunni and Shiite Islam are both not actually Islam. The morality and form of ethics exists regardless of the religion.
It's kind of the old metaphysical canard of 'Are things good because God says they are good or were they good before God identified them as good?'. I am saying it's the latter. Forms of morality are not inherent to religion otherwise sects wouldn't occur. Therefore, morality precedes religion and religion is simply it's disguise. You can believe whatever you want, though, there is no way to truely definitely prove this stuff.
Doesn't this affirm what Heaven_and_Earth is saying though? That these people's morality is informed by these earlier religious beliefs, and despite converting later they retain those same moral principles unexamined?
I feel like you are not really in disagreement, but maybe I'm misunderstanding your argument.
No, because those earlier beliefs in morality are not actually tied to the 'religion', unless you are attempting to claim that something like Sunni and Shiite Islam are both not actually Islam. The morality and form of ethics exists regardless of the religion.
It's kind of the old metaphysical canard of 'Are things good because God says they are good or were they good before God identified them as good?'. I am saying it's the latter. Forms of morality are not inherent to religion otherwise sects wouldn't occur. Therefore, morality precedes religion and religion is simply it's disguise. You can believe whatever you want, though, there is no way to truely definitely prove this stuff.