Failure to cut carbon emissions means ‘rapid transformation of societies’ is only option to limit impacts, report says

"Failure to cut carbon emissions means ‘rapid transformation of societies’ is only option to limit impacts"

The UN implies that the only way we'll be able to stop global warming, is if we implement socialism immediatly.

The 1.5°C degree limit is important because once we cross it, a domino-effect of self-reinforcing mechanisms is activated, see:

  • https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.abn7950
  • https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1810141115
  • neo [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Despite Andersen’s doubts that the necessary emission cuts can be made by 2030, she pointed to the plummeting costs of renewables, the rollout of electric transport, major climate legislation in the US, and moves by pension funds to back low-carbon investments.

    Only one of those things, the reduction in the costs of renewables, is tangible. The rest is fake.

      • TheModerateTankie [any]
        ·
        2 years ago

        :good-morning: It's called the "green dream or whatever" and if you :vote: and give the democrats a super-duper majority they will pass it immediately upon aproval from the parliament-funkadelictarian.

        • corgiwithalaptop [any, love/loves]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Hello yes I am the parliamenterino and I am here to judge quite strictly and arbitrarily the line between a super majority and a super duper majority

          You cannot get rid of me and according to freedom and democracy my word is law