How closely does it adhere to the book? Because the book spends a great deal of time humanizing the Germans, and anyone who sympathizes with the Germans is widely viewed a closeted nazi sympathizer. Yes, sure, you can claim the imperial Germans are different, good for you, have a cookie.
in WW1 everyone was basically as bad as each other WW1 Germany was genuinely not any worse than any other European power.
It's just a major red flag to be super into German military history by association. Similar to how it's dodgy to be super into indian symbology specifically swastikas we all know what you're doing there
I mean, in so far as detailing the experiences of a bunch of 17 and 18 year old children condemned to die in Hell for the glory of Capitalism is "Humanizing the Germans".
How closely does it adhere to the book? Because the book spends a great deal of time humanizing the Germans, and anyone who sympathizes with the Germans is widely viewed a closeted nazi sympathizer. Yes, sure, you can claim the imperial Germans are different, good for you, have a cookie.
in WW1 everyone was basically as bad as each other WW1 Germany was genuinely not any worse than any other European power.
It's just a major red flag to be super into German military history by association. Similar to how it's dodgy to be super into indian symbology specifically swastikas we all know what you're doing there
deleted by creator
I mean, in so far as detailing the experiences of a bunch of 17 and 18 year old children condemned to die in Hell for the glory of Capitalism is "Humanizing the Germans".