The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints said Tuesday it supports proposed federal legislation to safeguard same-sex marriages. “This is part of the church’s overall theology essentially sustaining the law of the land, recognizing that what they dictate and enforce for their members in terms of their behavior is different than what it means to be part of a pluralistic society,” he said.

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints said Tuesday it supports proposed federal legislation to safeguard same-sex marriages. It's the church's latest show of support in the lead-up to an expected congressional vote Wednesday.

The 17-million member, Utah-based faith said in a statement that church doctrine would continue to consider same-sex relationships against God's commandments, yet would support rights for same-sex couples as long as they didn't infringe upon religious groups' right to believe as they choose.

“We believe this approach is the way forward. As we work together to preserve the principles and practices of religious freedom together with the rights of LGBTQ individuals much can be accomplished to heal relationships and foster greater understanding,” an unnamed spokesperson for the church said.

Support for the Respect for Marriage Act under consideration in Congress is the church's latest step to stake out a more welcoming stance toward the LGBTQ community while holding firm to its belief that same-sex relationships are sinful.

Patrick Mason, a professor of religious studies at Utah State University, said the church's position was both a departure from and continuation of its past stances — respecting laws yet working to safeguard religious liberty and ensuring they won't be forced to perform same-sex marriages or grant them official church sanction.

“This is part of the church’s overall theology essentially sustaining the law of the land, recognizing that what they dictate and enforce for their members in terms of their behavior is different than what it means to be part of a pluralistic society,” he said.

The faith opposes same-sex marriage and sexual intimacy, but it has taken a more welcoming stance to LGBTQ people in recent years. In 2016, it declared that same-sex attraction is not a sin, while maintaining that acting on it was.

  • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    we forgot about them cuz we weren’t as good at keeping records back then.

    That is completely untrue. We still have tons of records from then, and we know there were more that were destroyed by fire, flooding, recycling, or just age. Muhammad was the leader of a military, so any such records being destroyed would make more sense. If there was anything like this about Jesus we would know, he was discussed at length by enemies and investigators from the very start of Christianity.

    Anyway, mormornism would've gotten rocked if it started earlier, it's attuned to a different cultural era than other forms of Christianity.

      • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]
        ·
        2 years ago

        IDK about Muhammad, not much of a Muslim scholar. I would guess that was considered appropriate at the time or they wouldn't have included it.

        As for Jesus, if we forgotabout guys from the sixties doing crap then it isn't a question of the quality of record keeping, or the difference between then and now. Every scrap of evidence had been analyzed since like 50 ad to today.

          • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]
            ·
            2 years ago

            I mean yeah it's possible. We know a lot of rumours were spread about Jesus and His followers back in the Roman empire, but the worst we see written about the man is that he's some kind of wizard or charlatan. If anyone was willing to call him a pedophile or a pervert they probably would have been recorded. But you're right it's possible the man Jesus could have done these things and been REALLY good at hiding it. It's worth noting there were a handful of other religious revivals of various kinds at the time, and a lot of messianism and end of the world talk in Israel at the time, so although modern thought places the origins of these religions in the category of "cult leaders," the people at the time saw them differently.