https://nitter.net/petergyang/status/1607443647859154946

  • UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • RION [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      This post is a great example of a place where AI cannot match humans, and won't be able to for a very long time or maybe ever. Computers completely shit the bed on interpreting ambiguous text from context clues (more on that here. If the problem were submitted in proper formula format to something like Wolfram alpha it would solve it no problem, but asking it conversationally gives results like this.

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • RION [she/her]
          ·
          2 years ago

          For sure. The turing test and its consequences :thonk-cri:

          • UlyssesT
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            deleted by creator

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Even yesterday I was called an “NPC” here because I didn’t like one not-an-alt wrecker’s take.

      I always assumed you were the DM.

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        deleted by creator

    • AbbysMuscles [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Something something meat computers

      That take is always extra frustrating because human brains are not computers. In fact we still have absolutely no idea what human consciousness fundamentally is.

    • fratsarerats [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      That doesn’t stop some folks, including on Hexbear, pulling the reductionist take of “and so are we, especially you if you disagree.” Something something meat computers something something meatspace get schwifty

      There was one meatspace bro on here who said that because of "meditation" that they agreed that we were basically giant meatballs or something like that. Honestly sounded like it came straight out of the Sam Harris subr*ddit...