it's also absurd/pathetic the numbers they give here. A 43% reduction in child mortality in 200 years equates to something like 0.215% change per annum. That's fucking disgraceful if you think that that's actually an achievement compared to the alternative system.
it's also absurd/pathetic the numbers they give here. A 43% reduction in child mortality in 200 years equates to something like 0.215% change per annum. That's fucking disgraceful if you think that that's actually an achievement compared to the alternative system.