The topic of discussion was the fact that we're trying to encourage employees to share salaries with each other. They wanted to try to argue that it was against the "corporate culture" and "Attitude" and that it creates an "uncomfortable work environment" where people who might not be willing to share that information are feeling pressured to, and compared it to sharing medical information.
That's not what I'm saying dude. Venezuela has the commune system where control of firms is handed directly into worker control. That's what practical socialization looks like. I'm not making an immediatist argument, I'm making the same arguments the Chinese left was in the late 60s.
Yes but there are still industrial bourgeoisie in the country, they are still likely trying to fuck the revolution, and a moral decision between incarceration, stripping their assets or execution is likely to be necessary at some point or another.
The problem that you have is that while stripping their assets is more moral from our point of view, the reaction is actually likely to be significantly worse for the country than imprisoning them because from the perspective of the bourgeoisie imprisonment is something they can avoid whereas stripping their assets is not. The other bourgeoisie are likely to ramp up their efforts against you as are the international bourgeoisie if you make the more moral choice from our point of view, this doesn't mean it's the most strategic and correct option.