Found it via FD Signifier’s recommendation. Good overview of the two cults and good fucking takedown of Hasan.

The comments are based too, esp when he takes down a simp who got super pissed that his favourite SucDem millionaire got mildly criticised

-> So, to be clear, hasan is right of me by a long ways. And he is a socdem, not an actual leftist he has leftist sympathies, sure, but that is not a leftist. He pushes multiple policies that are actively harmful to my community on the regular. Second, him getting roasted in this video is hardly infighting even if he was an actual leftist. Me, being honest is fine. If it isn't, then that's not a world i wanna live in. Like seriously shit wasn't even mean spirited.

  • dead [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    The video starts with a clip from Hasan saying that The Uhuru Movement (APSP) (African People's Socialist Party) and Black Hammer Party are connected because Gazi Kodzo founded the Black Hammer Party had formerly been the General Secretary of the APSP. At around 03:40 in the video, the video creator says the same line in agreement with Hasan.

    The video creator agrees with Hasan that both the Uhuru (APSP) and Black Hammer are cults. That's why "2 cults" in the video title. The video creator says that Uhuru (APSP) is bad because they just focus on pressuring white liberals into giving the organization money without advancing any material political goals. The video creator says that Black Hammer is bad because they created twitter drama, made a right wing turn, and then tried to build a commune in the Colorado mountains.

    The video concludes with the video creator making the claim that not knowing the precise history of these 2 fringe cults allows the CIA to infiltrate Leftist organizations. This video is entirely too pedantic. The 20 second clip of Hasan is from 6 months ago and out of context. It is from a longer 1 hour segment where he talks in much more detail about both the Black Hammer Party and The Uhuru Movement.