Because despite having better opinions 95% of communists still hold to liberal ways of thinking or liberal research statistics.
Nuclear was viable as a stopgap when solar and wind tech wasn't there yet. But there's no real reason to invest in it today as a main source of energy. If you say that then you'll inevitable get the "solar and wind isn't enough to supply energy" quote from Exxon Mobile and other fossil fuel researchers. They're aren't being deliberately reactionary, they just haven't re-examined their beliefs that far yet.
It's like how you had to re-learn that the American revolution wasn't actually about freedom and democracy. Just a remnant of lib brain worms that persist after the core has been removed.
The fact that Exxon mobile tier anti-renewable propaganda "renewable isn't enough" is accepted without a source proves my point. Brainworms on full display.
Because despite having better opinions 95% of communists still hold to liberal ways of thinking or liberal research statistics.
Nuclear was viable as a stopgap when solar and wind tech wasn't there yet. But there's no real reason to invest in it today as a main source of energy. If you say that then you'll inevitable get the "solar and wind isn't enough to supply energy" quote from Exxon Mobile and other fossil fuel researchers. They're aren't being deliberately reactionary, they just haven't re-examined their beliefs that far yet.
It's like how you had to re-learn that the American revolution wasn't actually about freedom and democracy. Just a remnant of lib brain worms that persist after the core has been removed.
Gonna need the non liberal stats showing that solar and wind is enough.
deleted by creator
Here's an entire scientific article on it
The fact that Exxon mobile tier anti-renewable propaganda "renewable isn't enough" is accepted without a source proves my point. Brainworms on full display.