:vote: :vote: :vote: :vote: :vote: :vote: :vote: :vote: :vote: :vote: :vote: :vote: :vote: :vote: :vote: :vote:

    • silent_water [she/her]
      ·
      1 year ago

      no shit. I'm saying you can't use an enumerable set to produce a mapping with the reals. the natural numbers are an infinite set yet are definitionally countable as they are the ordinals.

      disengage, you're arguing nonsense with someone with a literal degree in mathematics.

        • ella [any]MA
          ·
          1 year ago

          Respect people's right to disengage

        • ella [any]MA
          ·
          1 year ago

          Respect people’s right to disengage

        • silent_water [she/her]
          ·
          1 year ago

          that's the conceit of the joke, the idea that you can use an enumerated list and map them to the reals. if you could do such a thing, you'd immediately fall prey to Cantor's diagonalization argument. the train tracks are a continuum. they can be mapped to the reals. a neverending list of people cannot.

            • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]
              ·
              1 year ago

              The premise of the joke is incorrect because the joke thinks “infinity = infinity”.

              i fucking hate maths