This is a short article yet so quotable:

Even Social Democracy tends to oppose capitalism

In this survey of liberal style, a number of different themes can be observed. One of the foremost is the notion that liberals are lazy, or not zealous enough in their attempts to deal with incorrect, harmful, or counter-revolutionary principles in their society. Whether or not we agree with these observations, it's still possible to see where they originate: in liberal ideas of self-determination, and the freedom of people to hold their own opinions.

Elsewhere in the piece, Mao paints a fairly typical view of liberalism as a deg*nerate, decadent political belief system, [...] This notion of liberalism as a weak, milksop ideology that rejects war and conflict in favour of mediocrity, and an "unprincipled peace" is common among authoritarian movements that seek to replace it with a more dynamic, powerful one.

  • emizeko [they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    refers to all mainstream pro-capitalist viewpoints — so most forms of conservatism are also liberalism, but paleoconservatism, fascism and some reactionaries (read: those promoting mercantillist guilds) may actually avoid criticism

    wrong, wrong, wrong! what is this bullshit attempt to qualify with "mainstream", what is this idiot's idea of "paleo", and this guild shit is what, an appeal to pre-capitalist feudalism not being liberalism? how is feudalism mainstream? :stalin-stressed: