‘Hogwarts Legacy’ story and ending, explained
wegotthiscovered.com
Hogwarts Legacy is a bit of a different beast. You see, while nearly all the mainline Harry Potter video games have simply adapted a storyline from the

Not tagging this spoiler cause fuck TERFs, don't buy the game, uphold TC69 Thought etc. Have gotten this all from the above article and reviews that support it.

Yep, anti-semitic, slave-owning, Protocols of Zion plagiarising, let's join the anti-goblin pogrom game.

Yes the MacGuffin unambiguously belongs to the Goblins, who have a labour theory of ownership. No you can't join the Goblins. Yes you kill a bunch of them. Yes, there is a fucking quisling that's seen as good actually. Yes, every teacher thinks fighting the goblins is a good thing, despite a few token missions that apparently show how oppressed they are.

No, you never critique that this and every other aspect of the wizard world might be a bad thing.

I am once again calling for the House Elves to rise up, slit every slaver-wizard throat in Hogwarts, and place their heads on pikes outside the entrance as a warning to the others.

Don't. Buy. The TERF. Game.

  • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think serious damage has been done. It will be viewed as “problematic” in future.

    So? Many games, celebrities, sports and entertainment pieces are, yet they still top all the charts.

    Dave Chappelle just won a Grammy, Top Gun Maverick was the best movie last year despite being funded by literal blood money with regards to the US military, the FIFA world cup in Qatar last year broke viewership records and is going to the USA in 2026.

    All we're going do about thinking about stuff like this, is make us sad.

    • Awoo [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think you underestimate the effect this will have on a franchise that relies on parents thinking it's a good influence for their children.

      In 2018 Rowling was viewed positively by 58% of people. In March last year it was just 35%, by now it is significantly lower and we are combining her reputation with that of the franchise itself, these numbers are absolutely going to affect sales and decisions on whether to continue using the franchise or use something else that isn't covered in baggage.

      • doublepepperoni [none/use name]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Also, remember that before the TERFening, Rowling was already becoming a meme and hated by Potter fans because of her bizarre lore tweets and all the new additions to the franchise she was involved with being garbo even by HP standards

      • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I hope so and hope you're right, but I just don't see it. Harry Potter is too big an IP.

        We'll see with the sales figures of the new game.

        • Awoo [she/her]
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think the game will do well but that's gonna be because people buy it on thirst alone. They've been thirsting for this forever. Much like something like Cyberpunk. I'm not that interested in how this game does but in the impact on sentiment and attitudes towards buying anything from the franchise in future.

          The fanbase skews female too, which is important as mothers tend to be the purchase decision-makers when it comes to children at home.

        • Awoo [she/her]
          ·
          2 years ago

          The potential value of the franchise is in it being magical Star Wars where it continues to sell to new generations. That potential is severed by JK Rowling's idiocy. Someone else said imagine if Lucas had been a bigoted mouthpiece endlessly, imagine what that have done to Star Wars.

          Harry Potter had that potential and it has absolutely been turned into sludge. It's not going to shake her until she's either no longer collecting royalties or until she's dead.