I can’t really find an example right now, but I’ve seen conservative tellings of the civil rights era that were along the lines of the following:

“Restaurant owners and other business owners in the southern states wanted to be able to accept black patrons (because they were businessmen after all, and the only color they cared about was green), but because of Democrat Big Government, they weren’t allowed to”

The way I recall it is that this premise was then used in support of an equivalency between Jim Crow laws and Civil Rights laws, i.e. “First they were prohibited from taking customers that they wanted, and now they’re being forced to take all customers, even ones that they don’t want”.

I’m sure this is bullshit, but honestly I don’t know enough about that part of American history to refute it, and it kind of does make intuitive sense that a restaurant owner would want as many patrons as possible. So can one of you more knowledgeable folks here debunk it?

  • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Our small business tyrants opposed to the racist laws created by the government that they themselves control?

    :bugs-no:

    Our small business tyrants opposed to the racist laws that protect their positions of power by creating a social environment where anger at unessecary material suffering is redirected away from class conflict and instead into racial resentment?