Edit: Guys the point is this isn't newsworthy and that the News is posting clickbait, you don't have to solve the maths lmao

  • Dryad [she/her]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I really don't feel like this one is even ambiguous. Without further information why would you ever divide before multiplying? And even then it's not ambiguous, it's just a matter of what order of operations you prefer (arbitrary, a matter of notation rather than math).

    If you're a weirdo who does prefer to divide first then it's 9. Otherwise it's 1. Where's the confusion?

    • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      If you’re a weirdo who does prefer to divide first then it’s 9.

      The way I was taught the order of operations (BEDMAS: Brackets Exponents Division Multiplication Addition Subtraction) makes me divide first :kitty-cri:

      • ssjmarx [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I was taught that division/multiplication were the same step and you do them left to right. But I also never saw that dividing symbol again after 8th grade

      • Dryad [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        :farquaad-point: everyone look at this weirdo dividing first, I love bullying :sicko-pig:

      • Sen_Jen [they/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I learned BEMDAS in school, so I always multiplied first, but also I would just do this wrong anyway by counting multiplying as brackets

    • Gelamzer
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • Dryad [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It is alone. It's a 6 which you divide either by 2 or by the result of 2(1+2) depending on order of operations. All you're saying is "divide first and then you get 9" which I already said.

        • Gelamzer
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • Dryad [she/her]
            ·
            2 years ago

            But those mean the same thing. The problem is six divided by two times three. The problem is that regardless of what symbols you use to represent it. The only question is whether you treat it as (six divided by two) times three or as six divided by (two times three) which is purely a question of order of operation.