as an aside in the latest Trillbillies episode Terrence said that we need degrowth communism and it got me wondering what that means to everyone. to hopefully stifle any silly debates i'll clarify that i'm talking about the West, not underdeveloped/overexploited nations in the Global South.

an end to oil drilling, gas extraction, and coal mining will obviously be necessary to stop climate change. how much modern technology can we replicate without relying on those things or other ecologically violent resource extraction? what does an agriculture system that doesn't rely on petrochem-derived fertilizers and herbicides look like? how do we repair the immense damage that's already been done?

i'd really appreciate some book recommendations on this topic as well as everyone's thoughts

  • radiofreeval [any]
    ·
    1 month ago

    What about floating solar and desert solar? The Saharan biosphere is mostly dead and empty and has constant sun. Same with a large portion of the Southwestern US and Australia. Also boat only travel for overseas transport of people and perishables seems impractical.

    • itappearsthat [he/him]
      ·
      1 month ago

      boat only travel for overseas transport of people and perishables seems impractical

      Can you expand on what you mean by impractical?

      • radiofreeval [any]
        ·
        1 month ago

        Slow and needing more logistics for food for the trip. I also didn't know if we have low carbon boat technology yet as a lot of these boats are diesel powered.

        • itappearsthat [he/him]
          ·
          1 month ago

          Trips will take longer although satellite internet continues to improve, so working remotely on the ship is viable for jobs where that is possible. Despite their terrible emissions ocean freight is still far, far more carbon efficient than any other form of transport, even rail.

          • radiofreeval [any]
            ·
            1 month ago

            Is satellite internet a priority? It's very expensive and difficult to make, the supply chains are very long and launches produce millions of tons of CO2. I wonder if more efficient jet (or even propeller) travel would be better in the long run.

            • itappearsthat [he/him]
              ·
              1 month ago

              For carbon emissions, every space launch ever done in history completely pales in comparison to the 10s of thousands of aircraft crossing the globe every moment of every day. It is just not anywhere near the same order of magnitude. A single cross country flight for a single person emits more carbon emissions than citizens of many countries do in an entire year.