I feel like this has been a concept for a long time within imperialist studies, but I can't find it. Surely it's a thing. What would you call it?

EDIT: thanks for all the brilliant responses

  • BeamBrain [he/him]
    ·
    6 months ago

    If there is, I think it's definitely a catalyst behind things like Dark Forest Theory.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      6 months ago

      That is an excellent point. "Dark Forest Theory" being imperialists unable to imagine anything but imperialism.

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]
          ·
          6 months ago

          Good read. It is easier to imagine the end of the world (space aliens blow us up with the negative space wedgie gun) than it is to imagine the end of capitalism

      • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think they can imagine non-imperial societies; the argument is more that non-imperial societies will be destroyed by imperial ones, so you either compete as an imperial state or become part of someone else's empire. Same applies to the dark forest theory.

        This is different from capitalist realism, which:

        • Views AES states as simply another kind of capitalism ("state capitalism")
        • Views pre-capitalist economies as, you guessed it, pretty much capitalism (often the markets = capitalism oversimplification, as well as ignoring the communal aspects of societies)
        • Predominantly assumes capitalism as an economic system in fiction
          • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
            ·
            6 months ago

            You're right, they'd just flatten any state that effectively resists imperialism into another kind of empire, like they'll call the Soviet Union an empire.