I still don’t understand this argument. China’s economy did significantly better than the countries that let covid spread. Most countries had their economies shrink during a time when China’s grew, and the difference was zero covid.
Zero covid IS the economically sane policy. Sick people are expensive.
I can certainly see an argument for changing the details of zero-covid. Especially when it comes to different localities responding differently.
But they went from amazing if a bit too strict protections to nearly nothing and a lot of people have already died because of it, and I don’t see how China will avoid the same problem of having millions of newly disabled people with long-covid. And again, at least based on the numbers that the west use zero-covid was a much more economically sound policy than let-it-rip. China’s economy grew, others shrank.
"Massive" :doubt: I seem to recall quite a few of them being questionable.
deleted by creator
Oh, I get why they did it, but I think they're gonna regret it.
deleted by creator
Fingers crossed, but I think if they were feeling a strain before, millions and millions of people disabled aren't gonna help.
I still don’t understand this argument. China’s economy did significantly better than the countries that let covid spread. Most countries had their economies shrink during a time when China’s grew, and the difference was zero covid.
Zero covid IS the economically sane policy. Sick people are expensive.
deleted by creator
I can certainly see an argument for changing the details of zero-covid. Especially when it comes to different localities responding differently.
But they went from amazing if a bit too strict protections to nearly nothing and a lot of people have already died because of it, and I don’t see how China will avoid the same problem of having millions of newly disabled people with long-covid. And again, at least based on the numbers that the west use zero-covid was a much more economically sound policy than let-it-rip. China’s economy grew, others shrank.