William Strutt - A warm response (1889)

Oil on canvas - 41x39 cm

National Gallery of Australia

  • Quizzes [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    It's showing an animal in pain. Hoo hoo ha ha, that's a hilarious topic for a painting!

    • Fuckass
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • Quizzes [none/use name]
        ·
        2 years ago

        No, I'm reacting with feeling to an artwork, which is what you're supposed to do when you view art, fuckass.

        • Fuckass
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • Quizzes [none/use name]
            ·
            2 years ago

            Since when does the artist's intention ever matter? Jesus, do you even art?

            • Fuckass
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator

              • Quizzes [none/use name]
                ·
                2 years ago

                Oh. This is some Jordan Peterson thing. I see from the other comments.

                Well excuse the fuck out of me for having an emotional reaction to a piece of art. And immediately going to the defense of literal animals in pain. No, let's do the normal thing which is to ask the artist what he meant! That always gets a free pass.

                • Fuckass
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  deleted by creator

                  • Quizzes [none/use name]
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    I should have realized from the beginning about the whole lobster thing. All I did was focus on the dog and have an emotional reaction to an animal in pain. I promise to be more insensitive and less caring in the future. Oh, and be more online so I won't fail to recognize the lobster = JPB memes when they occur. Honestly I kind of forget the man exists today.