I think there's a difference between reading opposing viewpoints for little kernels of truth and believing even a single word on the aggregator site for all of Murdoch's News Corp tabloids in australia. I know it says it's Australia's Leading News Source, but it's genuinely on the same level as the National Enquirer or the Sun.
genuinely on the same level as the National Enquirer or the Sun.
This is patently false and your instance otherwise just proves you aren't arguing in good faith or are simply ignorant.
Every News company has shitty takes. The Guardian is just better at hiding their shitty takes while manufacturing consent for neoliberalism and neocolonialism. They are all garbage and you have to sift through them all. Furthermore they all give insight into the mind of our opponents.
I don't know what your thing about the guardian is, I don't like them either. But that doesn't change the fact that you're trying to die on this hill defending a lifestyle article from an online tabloid, about a weirdo crank UFOlogist talking out his ass for the hundredth time.
This is not a critical, underreported story being brought to light in a conservative newspaper that we're smearing just because it's a conservative source. This is a story about a sad, lonely old man begging for attention and only getting it from clickbait farms. Touch some grass, comrade.
Sure the story itself is silly and stupid but it does have useful information. This story shows the rot within american academia and the quality of hiring practices of the US Government.
Just because News.com prints trash like this doesn't mean the entirety of the site is bereft of any useful information as I originally said.
Touch some grass, comrade.
god that's cringe. go back to :reddit-logo: they probably still think this sort of thing is clever there.
I think there's a difference between reading opposing viewpoints for little kernels of truth and believing even a single word on the aggregator site for all of Murdoch's News Corp tabloids in australia. I know it says it's Australia's Leading News Source, but it's genuinely on the same level as the National Enquirer or the Sun.
This is patently false and your instance otherwise just proves you aren't arguing in good faith or are simply ignorant.
Every News company has shitty takes. The Guardian is just better at hiding their shitty takes while manufacturing consent for neoliberalism and neocolonialism. They are all garbage and you have to sift through them all. Furthermore they all give insight into the mind of our opponents.
I don't know what your thing about the guardian is, I don't like them either. But that doesn't change the fact that you're trying to die on this hill defending a lifestyle article from an online tabloid, about a weirdo crank UFOlogist talking out his ass for the hundredth time.
This is not a critical, underreported story being brought to light in a conservative newspaper that we're smearing just because it's a conservative source. This is a story about a sad, lonely old man begging for attention and only getting it from clickbait farms. Touch some grass, comrade.
Sure the story itself is silly and stupid but it does have useful information. This story shows the rot within american academia and the quality of hiring practices of the US Government.
Just because News.com prints trash like this doesn't mean the entirety of the site is bereft of any useful information as I originally said.
god that's cringe. go back to :reddit-logo: they probably still think this sort of thing is clever there.