https://archive.md/cyFyZ
Experts refer to Vienna’s Gemeindebauten as “social housing,” a phrase that captures how the city’s public housing and other limited-profit housing are a widely shared social benefit: The Gemeindebauten welcome the middle class, not just the poor. In Vienna, a whopping 80 percent of residents qualify for public housing, and once you have a contract, it never expires, even if you get richer. Housing experts believe that this approach leads to greater economic diversity within public housing — and better outcomes for the people living in it.
To American eyes, the whole Viennese setup can appear fancifully socialistic. But set that aside, and what’s mind-boggling is how social housing gives the economic lives of Viennese an entirely different shape. Imagine if your housing expenses were more like the Schachingers’. Imagine having to think about them to the same degree that you think about your restaurant choices or streaming-service subscriptions. Imagine, too, where the rest of your income might go, if you spent much less of it on housing. Vienna invites us to envision a world in which homeownership isn’t the only way to secure a certain future — and what our lives might look like as a result.
Perhaps no other developed city has done more to protect residents from the commodification of housing. In Vienna, 43 percent of all housing is insulated from the market, meaning the rental prices reflect costs or rates set by law — not “what the market will bear” or what a person with no other options will pay. The government subsidizes affordable units for a wide range of incomes. The mean gross household income in Vienna is 57,700 euros a year, but any person who makes under 70,000 euros qualifies for a Gemeindebau unit. Once in, you never have to leave. It doesn’t matter if you start earning more. The government never checks your salary again. Two-thirds of the city’s rental housing is covered by rent control, and all tenants have just-cause eviction protections. Such regulations, when coupled with adequate supply, give renters a level of stability comparable to American owners with fixed mortgages. As a result, 80 percent of all households in Vienna choose to rent.
In Vienna, 43 percent of all housing is insulated from the market, meaning the rental prices reflect costs or rates set by law — not “what the market will bear” or what a person with no other options will pay.
Cries in :kkkanada: ian
But educated professionals don't want to live next to the poors! Their peers might get them confused together!
You've got to live in a respectable ZIP code. Look it up on Zillow and it's got to have the right demographics. Fail this test, and get a low score the next time you have to pass through the HR gauntlet. Like attracts like. Top tech talents don't eat breakfast at the Waffle House.
This is exactly why any means testing program is bound to fail. Housing for all, healthcare for all, universal basic income are the way to go. It's almost like commodifying basic needs like housing and healthcare bound to create societal problems, and we wonder if there is policy alternative to commodifying basic human needs... :curious-marx:
Imagine treating something essential to life as such, rather than as a commodity
that's cos you havent read kazohinia.
to be fair, the first half is a pretty stupid critique of what the author thinks utopian communism is, but the second half is an amazing critique of the hell world we live in.
the best tale of gulliver.
anyway, in it, they explain that the only way to prevent homelessness is the following:
- workers build one end of a long block of flats
- they work, thus they get paid, thus they can pay the rent and live in the middle of the apartment building
- another group of workers is demolishing the building from the other end
- THESE also work, get paid and can afford rents in the middle of the building
and tada, the only logical system to prevent homelessness.
