Oh shit, I didn't realize that all land has the exact same fertility. The principle model of animal agriculture for the past 100 years has been to put the location on farmland that isn't productive anymore.
You're giving up land filled with lake sized puddles of toxic hog shit and you expect to grow beans there?
Is it a productive use of anyone's time to argue with someone who thinks that there is a single principal model of animal agriculture that has existed for a hundred years in the US, let alone across the world? No, it is not.
For others reading this, I am disengaging from this particularly rubbish line of argument because it suggests that - despite a huge percentage of land for feed crops being freed up - we would somehow be restricted to the comparatively tiny pig factory waste pools
If you got rid of animal agriculture you'd have so much land you'd never have to dick around with insects
Oh shit, I didn't realize that all land has the exact same fertility. The principle model of animal agriculture for the past 100 years has been to put the location on farmland that isn't productive anymore.
You're giving up land filled with lake sized puddles of toxic hog shit and you expect to grow beans there?
Is it a productive use of anyone's time to argue with someone who thinks that there is a single principal model of animal agriculture that has existed for a hundred years in the US, let alone across the world? No, it is not.
For others reading this, I am disengaging from this particularly rubbish line of argument because it suggests that - despite a huge percentage of land for feed crops being freed up - we would somehow be restricted to the comparatively tiny pig factory waste pools