RNAi [he/him] to chapotraphouse • 1 year agoA better world is possibleimagemessage-square25 fedilinkarrow-up199
arrow-up199imageA better world is possibleRNAi [he/him] to chapotraphouse • 1 year agomessage-square25 Commentsfedilink
minus-squareVampire [any]hexbear17·1 year ago It's designed to be more memory-efficient but isn't By converting jpgs to webps instead of leaving them alone, you add unnecessary cycles and have to store two instead of one Made by Gulag link
minus-squareAceivan [they/them]hexbear10·1 year agooh I thought it was just a container that could contain jpg or png tbh. but I guess it has its own algos for lossy and lossless idk take it up with pictrs link
minus-squareTankieTanuki [he/him]hexbear7·edit-21 year agoWhenever I convert a png to a lossless webp the file size seems to get cut in half. link
minus-squareNewAcctWhoDis [any]hexbear2·edit-21 year ago We consider this study to be inconclusive when it comes to the question of whether WebP and/or JPEG XR outperform JPEG by any significant margin. emphasis mine link
for real
can we stop Hexbear using webp please?
why
It's designed to be more memory-efficient but isn't
By converting jpgs to webps instead of leaving them alone, you add unnecessary cycles and have to store two instead of one
Made by Gulag
oh I thought it was just a container that could contain jpg or png tbh. but I guess it has its own algos for lossy and lossless
idk take it up with pictrs
Whenever I convert a png to a lossless webp the file size seems to get cut in half.
emphasis mine
deleted by creator