4zi [he/him, comrade/them] to chapotraphouse • 1 year agoDoes the existence of a petit bourgeoise necessitate a grande bourgeoisemessage-squaremessage-square6 fedilinkarrow-up123file-text
arrow-up123message-squareDoes the existence of a petit bourgeoise necessitate a grande bourgeoise4zi [he/him, comrade/them] to chapotraphouse • 1 year agomessage-square6 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareAlbanian_Lil_Pump [he/him]hexbear10·1 year agoIf you actually read Capital Volume 3, you would know that Marx has disproved that. It actually implies the existence of a busty bourgeoisie link
minus-square4zi [he/him, comrade/them]hexagonhexbear7·1 year agoOkay now be real no one, not even Marx himself, has read the third volume link
minus-squareBudwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]hexbear6·1 year agoI mean... He was long dead when it was published, so you're kinda right I guess It does have the whole 'tendency for the rate of profit to fall', though link
If you actually read Capital Volume 3, you would know that Marx has disproved that. It actually implies the existence of a busty bourgeoisie
Okay now be real no one, not even Marx himself, has read the third volume
I mean... He was long dead when it was published, so you're kinda right I guess
It does have the whole 'tendency for the rate of profit to fall', though