:19::84:

  • xXthrowawayXx [none/use name]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ty.

    I think in the absence of a public statement confirming it, if you have to make a distinction between diegetic and non diegetic forms of sexualization to explain one part of the change it might just be that a bunch of users that love those parts of the game gross the publisher out.

    Idk anything though so 🤷‍♀️

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, my initial wording was closer to that of the devs, talking about how the game features women who are "confident in their sexuality" or whatever but that some elements were "in poor taste", so theory liberal ideology/excuse-mongering is that the character models are characters expressing themselves and what they changed were a handful of instances where the sexualization, if anything, was going against the will of the character. I might just be talking in circles though.